Facebook button

Posts Tagged ‘police abuse’

Flunking the Attitude Test

Monday, January 17th, 2011

Weidner-Casual_19

Law enforcement officers have a difficult and challenging job.  They deserve to be treated with respect.  Law enforcement officers deserve respect because they are human beings with emotions and feelings like the rest of us.  However, the law does not demand that respect be given.  Some officers appear not to understand that lack of respect does not warrant an arrest.

The First Amendment prohibits law enforcement officials from arresting people for how they talk to, or yell at the police.  Even speech that is loud, disrespectful, profane, and insulting is protected in most circumstances.  Only words that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace (“Fighting Words”) are unprotected.  Unless your words amount to Fighting Words, the First Amendment protects the speech that is directed at a police officer from a civilian.

The Supreme Court stated in City of Houston v. Hill that freedom of individuals to verbally oppose police action without risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.  Speech keeps the wheels of democracy running smoothly.  The right of the individual to speak out directly, openly, and immediately against his government is perhaps the purest and messiest form of democratic axle grease.  The ability to oppose or challenge police action is not only a principal characteristic distinguishing a free nation from a police state, it is one of the central benefits of living in a free nation.  In a country where people are unable or afraid to challenge their government’s authority for fear that they will be beaten or arrested, that country has no meaningful way to check and balance their government power.

Despite First Amendment Protection, some law enforcement officers are arresting people for voicing their dissent or even videoing police. The police are generally arresting people for violating laws such as disorderly conduct, refusing to obey an officer, obstructing or delaying an officer, or resisting arrest.  When an officer arrests a citizen because they do not like what they said, this is an invalid arrest.  This type of arrest is called “contempt of cop arrest” or a “cover arrest.”  This type of arrest is by definition police abuse and against the law. They are made with no valid legal reason.
(more…)

Jury Convicts 3 Officers after Hurricane Katrina Murder

Friday, December 17th, 2010

http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/jury-convicts-3-officers-in-post-katrina-death-nt10-jgr1291986536695

hires

Crestview Police Officer Arrested on Drug Charges

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

As a result of an FDLE undercover operation, Crestview police officer Michael Abrisch has been charged with trafficking hydrocodone (Lortab) and possession of a controlled substance.  Reportedly, he purchased the Lortab pills from an undercover FDLE officer.

He is currently being held in the Okaloosa County Jail and has been suspended without pay from the Crestview Police Department pending an internal investigation.

Santa Rosa County Sheriff’s Lieutenant Has Been Fired

Friday, May 7th, 2010

Lieutenant Mitch Tomlinson of the Santa Rosa County Sheriff’ s Department has been fired.  Tomlinson was arrested in March for sexually molesting two young girls under the age of 12.  The Santa Rosa County Sheriff’s Office placed the lieutenant on administrative leave when Tomlinson was publicly arrested.  Tomlinson could face a life sentence if convicted of just one of the three capital sexual battery charges against him.

Escambia County Deputy Mike Priest Arrested

Friday, May 7th, 2010

Last Wednesday, Escambia County Sheriff David Morgan announced the arrest of  Deputy Mike Priest for sexual battery.   Deputy Priest had been placed on desk duty following allegations that he threatened a woman with public intoxication charges unless she performed sexual acts in his patrol car.  Deputy Priest is set to be arraigned on the two pending counts of sexual battery on May 20, 2010.

Pensacola Police Revises Policy

Monday, December 21st, 2009

On December 8, 2009, the Pensacola Police Department (PPD) announced that it had changed its “police chase” policy as a result of the death of 17 year old Victor Steen.  The change prohibits officers, in a police car,  from chasing vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians through heavily populated areas like apartment complexes and parking lots .  This change in policy comes after the PPD’s October revision to its taser policy, also a result of Steen’s death.  Officer Jerald Ard fatally injured Victor Steen on October 3, 2009 when Steen, on bicycle, fell into the path of Ard’s cruiser.  Officer Ard also fired a Taser from the window of his car while in pursuit of Steen.  The Florida Department of Law Enforcement continues to investigate Steen’s death and Officer Ard’s professional conduct.